RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00883
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. He be reimbursed $66.00 for billeting fees.
2. Any personal derogatory references on the AF Form 139 (Adjustment Authorization) be removed.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He departed from billeting and Ellsworth Air Force Base on 4 August 1984, which means he was not at the billeting during the months stated on AF Form 139 (September, October, and November 1984).
In support of his request, he provides a copy of AF Form 139, a copy of a registration card, and copies of billeting receipts.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant retired from the Regular Air Force after serving over 20 years in the grade of master sergeant (E-7) having assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank of 1 September 1979.
Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) does not have data available for 25 years ago.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took careful notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, the evidence provided is insufficient to determine that the DD Form 139, Pay Adjustment Authorization, deducting $66.00 from his pay for unpaid billeting fees was prepared erroneously. Unfortunately, due to the passage of time since this action occurred, pertinent records are no longer available. Therefore, based on the presumption of regularity in the conduct of government affairs, we must assume that the action was proper and the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the requested relief.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2009-00883 in Executive Session on 20 May 2009, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
Ms. Barbara J. Barger, Member
Mr. Noble K. Eden, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 March 2009, w/actchs.
Panel Chair
2
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, DC
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00606
The new procedures and AETC Form 139, Record of Commander's Review Action (Undergraduate Pilot Training) now allows for other options and leaves the return to UPT up to the discretion of the UPT commander. Had it been in use at the time of his elimination from pilot training, the AETC Form 139, Section III could have been used for his situation. The form states, "If recommended for elimination, the student should be considered for reinstatement in this course at a later date due to...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01180
On 2 Apr 02, the applicant's request for remission of his indebtedness of $2903.50 was considered and denied by the Director, Air Force Review Boards Agency (AFRBA) (Exhibit B). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AF/DPPCC noted that as a result of non-availability, the applicant's orders were amended to read "Members auth full per diem, for off base lodging and commercial meals to maintain team integrity. To remedy the error, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01031
When he arrived in Italy, billeting was not available; therefore, his orders were amended to allow for full per diem for off-base lodging and commercial meals. On 2 Apr 2002, the applicant's request for remission of his indebtedness of $3315.50 was considered and denied by the Director, Air Force Review Boards Agency (AFRBA) (Exhibit B). However, base level personnel should have also known better not to amend the order or to pay per diem not authorized.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02211
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02211 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Air Education and Training Command (AETC) Form 126A, Record of Commanders Review Action, be amended to include the remarks of the Eliminating Authority recommending him for consideration for reinstatement into Undergraduate Pilot Training (UPT) at...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02393
His record be changed to show he accepted a Regular Air Force (RegAF) appointment from the calendar year 1990 (CY90) Regular Air Force Appointment Board and that he held a Regular commission when he was considered for promotion to major by the CY95A and CY96A Major Selection Boards. DPPPOO’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant disagrees with the HQ USAF/REAMO advisory and...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 00565
Some commanders were authorized to receive the pay until 30 September 2007, if they continued to serve as a commander past the 1 January 2007 termination date. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states the 3rd SOS/CC billet was not on the original 2002 CRP authorization list because at the time, the unit did not yet exist. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00883
Additionally, the applicant was given 10 days to comment on the report and informed he could appeal the report under AFI, 36- 2401, Correction of Airman and Officer Evaluation Reports. The applicant did not file an appeal under the provisions of AFI 36-2401, Correcting Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Reports. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2007-00883 in Executive Session on 19 July 2007, under...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02466
Applicant’s HHGs have been in storage since May 95. However, the Air Force paid the fees associated with this error for over two years. Subsequently, the applicant was placed on notice the responsibility for payment of storage fees on his household goods was his.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-03496
of Air Force Instruction DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03496 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) date be changed to 1 August 2009 rather than 3 December 2011. In addition, in order to be considered for a low-cost PCS, the member has to specifically ask for consideration and...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00094
After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for the MH condition, and therefore, no disability ratings can be recommended. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 9 Jan 2014, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days...